Emilio Mira Y Lopez Manual de Psicologia Juridica. James Sanctis. www. osakeya.info osakeya.info osakeya.info osakeya.info www. osakeya.info 饾棧饾棗饾棛 | On Jan 1, , Ramon Arce and others published Psicolog铆a jur铆dica. Psicologia juridica osakeya.info Uploaded by. Johan Rinc贸n 路 Los Grandes Sistemas Juridicos Contemporaneos - Rene David (1). Uploaded by. Johan Rinc贸n.

Language:English, Spanish, Indonesian
Genre:Health & Fitness
Published (Last):08.10.2015
Distribution:Free* [*Registration Required]
Uploaded by: STEFAN

62572 downloads 169742 Views 37.70MB PDF Size Report

Psicologia Juridica Pdf

osakeya.info Uploaded by Lucia Salas Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd. Flag for inappropriate . Read the latest articles of Anuario de Psicolog铆a Jur铆dica at osakeya.info, Elsevier's leading platform of peer-reviewed scholarly ; Download PDF. Jur铆dica, capacitando-os para atuarem em Psicologia Jur铆dica, em . estar谩 dispon铆vel em PDF e poder谩 ser impresso quando o aluno o.

It emphasizes that some couples, even after divorcing, get trapped in a dynamics of repetition that functions through litigation, represented in custody actions, visiting regulations, and their consequences. The work focuses on the process of structuring and dissolving conjugality, emphasizing the difficulties involved in the process of elaborating mourning post-separation, based on psychoanalytic literature on loving relationships. It points out that the judiciary stage in separation, taken as a rite of passage, can represent a cut in bonding, contributing to perpetuate trapping ties. In order to illustrate this discussion, the works presents the analysis of a case of family litigation assisted by the judiciary in Rio de Janeiro. Keywords: Conjugal separation, Judicial litigation, Psychoanalysis.

The records retrieved and selected were included in a relational database, to facilitate the processing of the data. We equalized the variants that made little difference, such as the names of the authors, the members of the editorial committees and institutions.


After completing the work of standardization of the names of the authors and the institutions, we proceeded to unify the different variants that exist in the selected journals to indicate the "role" played by the authors in their various committees or management teams.

Lastly we went on to the analysis of the selected variables and their corresponding interpretations.

Variables The variables that became object of study were: Journal, including quartile, country of editing and indexing field within psychology.

Editorial teams, total number of members, all of them irrespective of whether they appear in more than one editorial team, and number of actual members, counting each researcher only once. Authors, counting the number of researchers, the number of articles and the number of signatures, differentiating between big, medium and small producers.

Gender, defined by the categories of man and woman. Descriptors, defined by the key words of the articles.

Analysis To obtain the indicators we have used a system of full recount, by assigning the same value to each of the authors or institutions that have participated in the work. All of these inquiries were carried out using the statistical package SPSS Results Characteristics of the journals that were our object of study The number of journals that related to Legal Psychology included in the year in the JCR database was Simultaneously, these journals were also included in the 4 categories in Psychology Multidisciplinary Psychology, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology.

Table 1 shows the relationship between the Legal Psychology journals included in the WoS database. The remaining 18 per cent of publications are issued in Australia, Spain and the Netherlands, countries which only publish one magazine each. In all the magazines, the language of publication is English. Members of staff of the journals and authors most relevant in the current field of Legal Psychology With the purpose of identifying the key figures in the field of research of Legal Psychology in the years and we have carried out an analysis of the researchers that were part of the staff of the journals studied, as well as the authors who have published many pieces collected in the WoS databases.

This means that two members are located in five editorial committees, 6 members in four committees, 16 members in three committees, 47 in two committees and in a single committee. Table 2 provides us with information about the members that are part of 5 and 4 editorial committees of Legal Psychology magazines during the year , together with the institution and country to which they belong and the title of the journal.

In determining whether there were differences in regards to gender in relation to the number of magazine committees, there was a statistically significant difference, t Among the members who form part of 4 and 5 committees there are 8 men The members of these editorial teams work in institutions belonging to 27 countries.

In the year the number of papers published in WoS journals related to Legal Psychology was , of whom were articles and reviews, with authors and a total of signatures. During the year , the number of papers was , of which were articles and reviews, with authors and with a total of signatures.

The rate of growth in the number of papers published between and is An important indicator connected to authorship, which measures the degree of collaboration between the authors is the index of signatures to work. It is estimated by determining the average number of authors who sign each published work. The index of signatures to work of the year in Legal Psychology was 2. The authors can be grouped into three levels of productivity, large producers in our case, more than 5 articles , medium-sized producers between 2 and 5 articles and occasional authors or casual authors of a single article.

As is reflected in Table 3 there is a greater number of high producing authors in the year , while in there has been an increase in the number of medium-sized producers compared to the year Tables 4 and 5 include the authors with the highest number of publications about Legal Psychology during the years and in the WoS databases. In the year a prominent figure is the one of T.

Considering the large number of article writers in the years and relevant figures like Beaver, Kevin M. Also, standing out, figures like Vrij, Aldert the largest producer of work in as the author with the most presence in magazine editorial committees and Ward, T. Knowing the evolution and the defining characteristics of Legal Psychology, implies analysing the descriptors or keywords used by the authors in their articles and reviews, which provide information on what issues have more relevance in this discipline.

In this regard, it is interesting to know what terms are most used and what disorders have aroused greater interest among researchers. Em: G.

Pereira Orgs. Original publicado em Legendre, P. Em: S. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter.

Lemaire, J. Le couple, sa vie et sa mort.

Paris: Payot. Peluso, A. Pereira, R. Puget, J. Ramos, M. Reis, E. Shine, S. Sanchez Orgs.


Silva, D. Souza, I. Vainer, R. Groeninga, G. Em: G.

Pereira Orgs. Original publicado em Legendre, P. Em: S.

[PDF] Fundamentos de La Psicologia Juridica (Spanish Edition) Popular Collection

Rio de Janeiro: Revinter. Lemaire, J. Le couple, sa vie et sa mort. Paris: Payot. Peluso, A. Pereira, R.

PSICOLOG脥A osakeya.info

Puget, J. Ramos, M. Reis, E. Shine, S. Sanchez Orgs. Silva, D.

Souza, I.